UK Regulator FCA Plans to Ban Investors from Taking Out Loans to Buy Crypto ⋆ ZyCrypto

By: bitcoin ethereum news|2025/05/03 05:15:01

The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) plans to stop retail traders from obtaining loans to fund their crypto investments. The FCA is bringing forth a range of crypto regulations, including this added restriction. David Geale, FCA executive director, said there was an extensive range of opportunities for crypto investors and many risks. He said the agency was committed to ensuring crypto investment was done correctly in the UK. Geale rejected claims that he was hostile towards the crypto industry, and countered that claim by saying that an appropriate level of protection was needed for consumers. Geale believes that the crypto market is a high-risk category and that necessary protections must be implemented. The FCA is attempting to avoid unsustainable debt within the British public and believes that crypto could present an immediate threat to the UK economy if left unchecked. The problem, according to the FCA, is that loans for crypto could become unsustainable during a price drop. Many consumers could panic and withdraw their investments, losing a lot of money that had been borrowed in the first place. The loan ban could also include credit cards, because crypto investors may rely on credit to spend more than they can afford. In 2024, the FCA researched the crypto market and found that the leading method of funding crypto purchases was with personal income, with 72% of purchases according to their research. They found, however, an increase in credit purchases, from 6% in 2022 to 14% in 2024. The crypto market remains largely unregulated. The FCA and other regulators have noticed that crypto is not going away anytime soon, so there is an urgent need to integrate crypto within preexisting regulatory frameworks. Around 7 million people in the UK are estimated to own crypto, representing 12% of the population. The FCA has tried to warn consumers about the risks of crypto and the potential to lose all of their investment. According to the FCA, their actions show a sincere desire to protect consumers from risky assets and save the public time and money. The FCA’s stance on crypto is that investors should be prepared to lose all of their money. UK consumers, meanwhile, will still be able to buy stablecoins on credit, but only with FCA-approved exchanges. The FCA is concerned about the 14% of crypto investors buying on credit last year. This is substantial and could be more serious depending on the type of crypto these investors placed their money on. Cryptocurrency is a broad term that includes well-established tokens and scam ecosystems that prey on vulnerable investors. The FCA may also conduct tests for investors to see if they have good knowledge of financial systems. The FCA may also attempt to target staking, although it may struggle to regulate a decentralized market. They may ban banks from issuing loans for clients wishing to stake their tokens. This approach seems contrary to the American regulators, allowing banks to apply their risk management expertise to judge clients on a case-by-case basis. The crypto industry has criticised the FCA for being overly restrictive, only approving 51 of 368 firms applying for crypto licenses in the past 5 years. The public can comment on the FCA regulations until June 13. Source: https://zycrypto.com/uk-regulator-fca-plans-to-ban-investors-from-taking-out-loans-to-buy-crypto/

The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.

There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."

Question One: Is this encryption the same as Signal's encryption?

No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.

In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.

X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.

This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.

The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.

The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.

After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."

From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.

In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.

As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."

Issue 2: Does Grok know what you're messaging in private?

Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.

For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.

This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.

There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."

Issue 3: Why is there no Android version?

X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.

In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.

WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.

X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.

These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.

Elon Musk's "Super App"

This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.

X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.

Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.

The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.

X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.

The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.

Parse Noise's newly launched Beta version, how to "on-chain" this heat?

Noise is planning to launch its mainnet on Base in the coming months, at which point the platform will be open to everyone and support real-money trading.

Is Lobster a Thing of the Past? Unpacking the Hermes Agent Tools that Supercharge Your Throughput to 100x

The longer you use it, the smarter it gets, what makes Hermes, where developers have migrated to, special?

Declare War on AI? The Doomsday Narrative Behind Ultraman's Residence in Flames

When saving humanity becomes the sole criterion, action boundaries start to blur

Crypto VCs Are Dead? The Market Extinction Cycle Has Begun

In the face of high-quality projects, VCs are starting to shift from screeners to candidates.

Claude's Journey to Foolishness in Diagrams: The Cost of Thriftiness, or How API Bill Increased 100-Fold

From $300 to $40,000

Edge Land Regress: A Rehash Around Maritime Power, Energy, and the Dollar

Whoever controls the seas controls the monetary system; once trapped in an inland game, one will lose initiative

Arthur Hayes Latest Interview: How Should Retail Investors Navigate the Iran Conflict?

In the turbulent year of 2026, what are the truly valuable assets to hold?

Just now, Sam Altman was attacked again, this time by gunfire

Sam Altman's residence was shot at again, reflecting the deep anxiety and crisis of trust among the public regarding the accelerated evolution of AI into a "quasi-political force" and the lack of social checks and balances behind the extreme violence.

Straits Blockade, Stablecoin Recap | Rewire News Morning Edition

Oil Price Surges

From High Expectations to Controversial Turnaround, Genius Airdrop Triggers Community Backlash

The deadline for immediate claim is 7 days after TGE. If the user chooses immediate claim, 70% of the tokens will be automatically burned.

The Xiaomi electric vehicle factory in Beijing's Daxing district has become the new Jerusalem for the American elite

What exactly turns an automotive assembly line into a hot spot?

1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars

Liquidity saved Polkadot's life.

After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?

The US has taken away Iran’s most important card, but has also lost the path to ending the war

Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions